Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 17, Issue 1 (January 2015) 17, 120–123; doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.138189

Use of the UPOINT phenotype system in treating Chinese patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective study

Xiao Guan, Cheng Zhao, Zhen‑Yu Ou, Long Wang, Feng Zeng, Lin Qi, Zheng‑Yan Tang, Jin‑Geng Dun, Long‑Fei Liu

Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.

Correspondence: Dr. LF Liu (longfei_liu@163.com)

Received: 14 March 2014; Revised: 22 May 2014; Accepted: 15 July 2014

Abstract

The urinary, psychosocial, organ‑specific, infection, neurological/systemic and tenderness (UPOINT) phenotype system has been validated to be an effective phenotype system in classifying patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) in western populations. To validate the utility of the UPOINT system and evaluate the effect of multimodal therapy based on the UPOINT system in Chinese patients with CP/CPPS, we performed this study. Chinese patients with CP/CPPS were prospectively offered multimodal therapy using the UPOINT system and re‑examined after 6 months. A minimum 6‑point drop in National Institutes of Health‑Chronic Prostatitis Symptoms Index (NIH‑CPSI) was set to be the primary endpoint. Finally, 140 patients were enrolled in the study. The percentage of patients with each domain was 59.3%, 45.0%, 49.3%, 22.1%, 37.9%, and 56.4% for the UPOINT, respectively. The number of positive domains significantly correlated with symptom severity, which is measured by total NIH‑CPSI scores (r = 0.796, P < 0.001). Symptom duration was associated with a greater number of positive domains ( 0.589,  0.001). With 6 months follow‑up at least, 75.0% (105/140) had at least a 6‑point improvement in NIH‑CPSI after taking the therapy. All NIH‑CPSI scores were significantly improved from original ones: pain 10.14 ± 4.26 to 6.60 ± 3.39, urinary 6.29 ± 2.42 to 3.63 ± 1.52, quality of life 6.56 ± 2.44 to 4.06 ± 1.98, and total 22.99 ± 7.28 to 14.29 ± 5.70 (all  0.0001). Our study indicates that the UPOINT system is clinically feasible in classifying Chinese patients with CP/CPPS and directing therapy.

Keywords: chronic pelvic pain syndrome; chronic prostatitis; drug therapy; prospective study; UPOINT

Full Text | PDF | 中文摘要 |

 
Browse:  1710
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.